 
		        
		  Canada’s new accessibility laws should  focus on employment, inclusive buildings, transport
		  
          The  priorities, which were laid out in a report and released by the federal  government Monday, summarize eight months of consultations held with Canadians  from coast to coast.
Thestar.com
May 29, 2017
By Michelle McQuigge
Public consultations on Canada’s first national law for disabled people have  identified high unemployment rates, inaccessible buildings and barriers in  transportation as some of the key issues that need to be addressed.
The priorities  were laid out in a report, released by the federal government Monday,  summarizing eight months of consultations held with Canadians from coast to  coast.
It says  participants wanted to see laws that would help lower stubbornly high  unemployment rates for those with disabilities, reduce the number of buildings  inaccessible to those with physical and intellectual disabilities, and remove  accessibility barriers for the country’s air, rail, ferry and bus  transportation systems.
Those  consulted also named government program and service delivery, information and  communications and procurement of goods and services as key areas of focus.
The report  also says Canadians have voiced a strong preference for the government to set  up an independent body to oversee compliance with the new laws, which are  expected to come before the House of Commons in early 2018.
Minister for  Sport and Persons with Disabilities Carla Qualtrough said the consultations  have laid the groundwork for her to begin crafting the legislation.
“It’s  definitely marching orders for me in terms of what Canadians want to see in  accessibility legislation,” Qualtrough said in an interview. “My goal now is to  figure out how we write into law these concepts and these principles and these  specific ideas.”
The  prospective act, which disability rights advocates have been seeking for years,  would govern areas that fall under federal jurisdiction, such as banks,  telecommunications, and interprovincial transportation.
The report  currently estimates one in seven Canadians has some form of disability and  projects that number will increase as the population ages.
Those are not  confined to visible conditions such as blindness or paralysis, but include  mental health disorders, learning disabilities, and episodic ailments such as  epilepsy and multiple sclerosis.
The sweeping  new legislation will attempt to eliminate barriers for this growing  demographic, taking an equally broad view of what a barrier entails.
“My definition  of ‘barrier’ is anything that impairs or prevents access, physically or  mentally, to any physical movement, learning and/or acceptance by others,” the  report quotes one contributor as saying. “Ergo, ‘accessibility’ successfully  counters or eliminates the barriers.”
The report  said 6,000 Canadians participated in the consultations between June 2016 and  February 2017. An additional 90 organizations also offered input.
Employment  issues were the top priority identified by the report.
Data has long  shown that Canadians with disabilities are greatly under-employed compared to  their non-disabled counterparts. Two years ago, Statistics Canada released  figures putting the employment rate for disabled Canadians at 49 per cent,  compared to 79 per cent for the general population.
Qualtrough  noted that many smaller issues are also contained within the broad categories  highlighted by the report, citing immigration as an example.
Current  legislation effectively bars many people with disabilities from securing  long-term status in the country, and Qualtrough said the government is looking  to make changes. Such efforts, she said, would fall under the umbrella of  programs and services.
So could  policies such as those in place at Passport Canada, which currently forbid  staff from helping a person with a disability complete their forms.
Transportation  regulations could help address situations such as one that arose at Via Rail  and culminated in a federal agency ruling that the company had to allow more  than one mobility device at a time to be tied down on its trains.
Advocates,  however, are hoping the government’s plans become more concrete as the  legislation takes shape.
James Hicks,  National Co-ordinator of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities, said the  consultations were more an airing of grievances than a forum for tabling ideas  on how to bring about change.
He said the  process was important, but hoped the legislation will go beyond aspirational  statements.
To that end,  the council is joining other community-based groups that will continue  soliciting feedback from Canadians. Hicks said the government is paying for the  additional feedback and will hopefully put it to good use.
He said one  suggestion the government will hear involves forcing provinces to consider  disability issues when applying for federal funds.
He said all  proposals submitted to cabinet today must include a gender analysis to account  for the impact on women, adding he’d like to see the new law require something  similar for the disabled.
“Why is there  not a disability lens that has to be done on every single request for funding  that goes to cabinet?” he said. “That way every department has to look at it  and has to say ‘this is what we need to do to ensure equal access for people  with disabilities.”
Qualtrough said  the report was firm on one concrete measure - once the law is in place, an  independent body must be set up to ensure people are complying with it.
Currently,  discrimination complaints come before provincial or federal human rights  commissions only after an offence has taken place.
“We shouldn’t  have to wait until someone’s discriminated against to help them,” Qualtrough  said. “It’s not enough. Loud and clear I heard that it’s not enough.”