Tracking  implementation part of review - Growth plan performance
            
            
NRU
April 1, 2015
By Leah Wong
The province has released a first look in how effectively  the Growth Plan is being implemented across the Greater Golden Horseshoe.
            
            As part of the coordinated review of the Growth Plan, Greenbelt  Plan, Niagara Escarpment Plan and Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, the  Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing has introduced 14 performance  indicators to track implementation of the Growth Plan. A separate set of indicators  has been developed to monitor implementation of the three greenbelt plans.
            
            The Growth Plan indicators were developed by provincial staff  following a review of best practices and expert and stakeholder consultation  and a draft was released in early 2014. The recently released performance  indicators include two new environmental indicators to measure watershed  conditions and transportation sector greenhouse gas emissions. Also, the  greenfield area density indicator has been significantly revised from the draft  .
            
            The ministry is proposing to report the data analysis for these  performance indicators following the release of Census/National Household  Survey every five years. Preliminary results are included in the indicator  document.
            
            The indicators are organized in four themes: building  compact and efficient communities; creating vibrant and complete communities; planning  and managing growth to support a strong and competitive economy and protecting,  conserving, enhancing and wisely using natural resources.
            
            BUILDING COMPACT AND EFFICIENT COMMUNITIES
            
            Many municipalities in the GGH have achieved, or exceeded,  their 2015 intensification targets and urban growth centre densities. The  Growth Plan requires that by 2015, a minimum of 40 per cent of residential development  within each upper- and single-tier municipality lies within its built-up area.  Between 2007 and 2010 the region’s upper- and single-tier municipalities achieved  an average annual intensification rate of 60 per cent. As of 2011 all but three  urban growth centres had achieved more than 20 per cent of their 2031 target  densities.
            
            Major transit station area density is a baseline against which  density changes in the future can be measured. It shows how area densities  compare with target densities set out in the Growth Plan.
            
            Designated greenfield area density is defined by lot sizes, mix  of housing and estimated densities. As of 2011 residential lot sizes in  designated greenfield areas were smaller than in previous decades. At that time  estimated densities across the entire designated greenfield area were 51 people  and jobs combined per hectare in the inner ring and 23 people and jobs combined  per hectare in the outer ring (beyond the Greenbelt). The planned densities in  the inner ring were set for 50 people and jobs per hectare, while a number of  outer ring municipalities have lower minimum density targets.
            
            CREATING VIBRANT AND COMPLETE COMMUNITIES
            
            Between 2006 and 2011 there has been a shift in housing  types towards higher density development across the region. While the condo sector  in Toronto has been strong during this time, outside of the city single-detached  housing is the dominant type. In 2013, 87 per cent of new housing units in  Toronto were apartments, while 47 per cent of new units in the inner ring  (excluding Toronto) and 57 per cent in the outer ring were single-detached  houses.
            
            The urban growth centres are performing higher than  designated greenfield areas with respect to many of the complete community  characteristics. Their diversity of land uses is higher, with the highest  diversity values in urban growth centres with historic downtowns such as  Guelph, Barrie and Waterloo. Residential units are also more likely to be  located within 800 metres of community amenities in centres than in designated  greenfield areas. They are also more pedestrian-friendly.
            
            PLAN AND MANAGE GROWTH TO SUPPORT A STRONG AND COMPETITIVE  ECONOMY
            
            Results for transportation modal split and trip distance by mode  will provide a baseline for future comparisons. Between 2006 and 2011 there was  minimal change in the per cent of trips made by each mode of transportation,  but auto trips for the morning commute decreased by 1 per cent. In that time period  the median distance for all trips grew slightly, with the exception being auto trips  in the inner ring, which decreased.
            
            Major office space locations indicate that since 2006 there has  been 16.9-million square feet of office space built or under construction in  the GTA. Approximately 66 per cent was located in urban growth centres and  major transit station areas.
            
            PROTECT, CONSERVE, ENHANCE AND WISELY USE NATURAL RESOURCES
            
            The indicator of watershed conditions looks at the  percentage of impervious services, natural cover, wetland and woodland features  in GGH watersheds. The current results serve as a baseline to assess changes in  watershed conditions and are presented in relation to Environment Canada’s  minimum guidelines for watershed coverage. Of the 124 sub-watersheds in the  region, 77 per cent have less than 10 per cent impervious surfaces, 65 per cent  are more than 10 per cent wetlands and 14 per cent have more than 30 per cent  woodland cover.
            
            The ministry has also released baselines for transportation  greenhouse gas emissions. The City of Toronto had the largest amount of total  GHG transportation emissions, but the lowest per capita. Upper- and single-tier  municipalities in the outer ring had lower emission rates, but higher per  capita transportation emissions.
            
          At this time there are no results for the land  consumption indicator, as it will only  be measured if there is a settlement area expansion beyond the built boundaries  set when municipal official plans were brought in conformity with the Growth  Plan.