Road tolls could be timed to transit expansion, think tank says
Charging drivers users fees could raise revenue the city needs and cut rush-hour car traffic by 22 per cent, says a report from the Pembina Institute.
Thestar.com
            Dec. 3, 2015
            By Tess Kalinowski
  
            Even as politicians continue to bat away the idea of road tolls, another study  - the second in a month - suggests that charging drivers a modest user fee  could help raise badly needed civic revenue, ease Toronto’s crippling  congestion and reduce smog.
  
            A  rush-hour toll of 21 cents per kilometre on the length of the Gardiner  Expressway and Don Valley Parkway could raise $513 million a year for Toronto,  says a report published by the Pembina Institute.
  
            The  study appears on the environmental think tank’s website just as Toronto’s mayor  and city manager are talking about new taxes and tools to raise money for  housing and transit.
  
            The  Pembina report recommends a staged approach to tolling, one that would  eventually incorporate provincial highways as the region’s rapid transit  expansion comes online.
  
            It  envisions a starting rush-hour toll of 14 cents per km that would raise $487  million annually. Then, in Phase 2 in 2025, the rate would rise to 21 cents per  km in rush hours, generating $513 million a year. The tolls would be lower in  off-peak hours.
  
            In  the third and final phase, in 2031, tolls to the 400 series highways would  raise an additional $2.5 billion, says the report. By then, the GO system would  be electrified and the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Spadina subway extension to  York Region would be running.
  
            Written  by Cherise Burda, now with the Ryerson City Building Institute, and B.C.  economist Lorie Srivastava, the Pembina report also quantifies the  environmental, safety and health benefits of reduced congestion resulting from  road pricing.
  
            Toll  revenue could be invested in rebuilding infrastructure such as the east end of  the Gardiner.
But  where governments invest depends on the policy’s objectives, said Pembina’s  Ontario director.
            
  “If  you’re putting in some form of road pricing, are you doing it to cover the  infrastructure costs? Are you doing it to get an environmental benefit?” said  Eli Angen. “If your goal is to reduce congestion and move around the city  better, it should be invested in transit infrastructure.”
  
            The  study, “Fare Driving: Exploring the benefits of traffic pricing in Toronto and  the GTA,” follows Canada’s Ecofiscal Commission’s report endorsing the conversion  of high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes in the Toronto region to high occupancy  (HOT) toll lanes.
  
            The  province has promised to release details of a HOT lane test project before the  end of the year.
  
            The  Pembina report recommends a more drastic approach - tolling entire stretches of  road, instead of individual lanes. It does not discuss road pricing technology  or implementation costs.
  
            The  study proposes a scenario in which road pricing kicks in next year and the  tolls go up again in 2025 as more transit options become available. But Angen  concedes that 2016 isn’t plausible.
  
            The  Yonge subway is over-capacity and the Richmond Hill and Stouffville GO lines  don’t yet offer enough service to attract many of the people who would be  driving north-south on the Don Valley Parkway.
  
  “I  don’t think it’s entirely appropriate to start tolling people when we haven’t  provided alternatives,” he said.
  
            If  tolls were extended to the DVP, the Gardiner and provincial highways  surrounding Toronto, greenhouse gas emissions would be reduced by nearly 360  million kg of CO2.
  
            Angen  says that’s the equivalent of taking 75,000 cars off the road, or the  equivalent of residential greenhouse gases for the province of P.E.I.
  
            The  big difference between the Pembina study and other engineering-based road  pricing reports is that it takes into account human behaviour, said co-author  Srivastava.
  
  “Once  people have to pay a toll, some of them are definitely going to get out of  their car.”
Potential impacts of  tolling by 2025
            
            Reduced  traffic (per day)
  
            Congestion  would decline considerably under Pembina's tolling scenario. Even though rush  hour tolls would increase to 21 cents per km by 2025, drivers would have more  transit options with SmartTrack, and electrified Kitchener and Stouffville GO  lines.
  
            Shorter  round trips
  
            Time  savings estimates are calculated using a minutes-per-kilometre travel time  contained in a Conference Board of Canada study of Highway 407 ETR. It takes  into account a number of factors including the number of drivers who would  switch to transit, change their route or change their journey departure time  based on having to pay a toll. The growing number of drivers in the region has  also been factored in.
  
            Time  is money
  
            The  cost of time saved is based on a projected 2025 hourly wage of $38 per hour in  peak commuting times and $15.20 per hour for non-rush periods. Although  commuting times probably don't translate to in-pocket savings for most people,  it is one way of putting value on time.
  
            Lower  cost of driving