Provincial government plans to create new home care agency

Personal care providers concerned new crown agency will add another level of bureaucracy

Yorkregion.com
Nov. 7, 2017
By Kim Zarzour

A shake-up is in the works for Ontario's troubled PSW system - one the Ministry of Health promises will allow clients more control and greater choice when it comes to hiring personal caregivers.

But reaction from those who currently provide that care, to the formation of a proposed new Crown agency, is mixed.

In 2015/16, more than 729,000 people in Ontario received home care services, an increase of more than 115,000 in five years - and studies show an increasing number of those patients were deemed "high need."

Most of that care was delivered by nurses and PSWs employed by for-profit and not-for-profit agencies.

In the coming months, the ministry plans to roll out a new option, called Self-directed Personal Support Services Ontario, for clients with "complex conditions."

Eligible clients will select and schedule personal support workers from this new government body that will act as an "alternative form of service delivery" in parallel to the existing home care system, a ministry spokesperson said Monday.

The new organization will handle security checks, recruitment, retention and payroll, "which we have heard from clients are components they don't want to take on," said the spokesperson.

The ministry plans to work with three of the province's 14 local health integration networks (LHINs) in the coming months to launch self-directed care to the most vulnerable patient populations.

The move towards self-directed care will contribute to better health outcomes, the spokesperson said, pointing to research that shows it can lead to increased home care client satisfaction, improved relationships between client and care provider and meeting more of the client's needs.

Ontario Health Coalition welcomed the prospect of a "public home care system," saying it would eliminate hundreds of redundant company administrations, profit taking, duplicate systems and poor communication and coordination.

The coalition said in a statement released today that every province in Canada has a more public home care system than Ontario does.

The $1.5 billion spent by contracted home care companies is paid for through taxes, but the provincial auditor has no power to audit the companies' financial records to verify their numbers, the coalition added.

"A public home care system would be a great leap forward: a huge benefit to Ontarians. It is, without question, in the public interest."

But PSW providers and agencies are concerned that any move to turn personal support workers into provincial employees means the ministry will funnel taxpayer dollars towards more bureaucracy.

"Why recreate the wheel yet again by forming another organization that is going to cause more confusion, more chaos in the home care sector?" said Miranda Ferrier president of the 33,000-member Ontario Personal Support Workers Association.

Ferrier says the $2.5 million being allotted for the new government organization would be better directed towards the front line where it's needed most, "with the patients and clients and families and PSWs and home care nurses."

Home Care Ontario expressed similar concerns.

"Demand for home care has increased in the last number of years," said Sue VanderBent, CEO, Home Care Ontario.

"In this environment, we need to ensure funding is directed towards front line care, not redirected towards potentially duplicative administrative activities.

A recent Auditor General's report found that as much as 39 per cent of home care funding was being spent on bureaucracy, specifically Community Care Access Centres.

VanderBent questioned why the agency was being put in place without consulting practitioners, system experts or existing service providers. She urged the government to halt implementation of the agency in order to consult with stakeholders first.

PC health critic Jeff Yurek shared those sentiments.

The ministry appears to be "siloing PSWs within a new bureaucracy," he said.

"If you want to go down that route, you should have talked with the agencies...the frontline providers, first, to see what gaps they think need to be addressed."