City staff seek  judicial review of arbitrated firefighter contract
          Rare step of seeking a judicial review of an arbitrated  firefighters settlement. A public body elected to represent Torontonians,  council deemed it fit to discuss and vote on motion in private.
          
          Thestar.com
          Nov. 9, 2017
          By Betsy Powell
  
          City staff have taken the rare step of seeking a judicial review of an  arbitrated settlement on the latest contract for Toronto firefighters.
          
          A recent report from the city manager found that award to be  “almost entirely one-sided and unbalanced.”
          
          Members of council’s left-wing were unhappy with the move  made public for the first time at its monthly meeting, which stretched into its  third day Thursday.
          
  “I believe this will not achieve the intended goal,”  Councillor Janet Davis told council. “This will sour relationships with one of  our largest employee groups.
  
          Davis said she is unaware of any court ever overturning an  arbitrator’s contractual award through judicial review.
          
  “I don’t believe that this was a wise decision. I don’t  believe that decision was based on ... information that would lead us to be  successful in this ... litigation.”
  
          Councillor Gord Perks said it was also entirely improper and  perhaps unprecedented for council to vote on the issue during a closed  door-session.
          
          Council decided to discuss and vote on a motion in private.
          
  “Unfortunately, I’m not allowed to tell anybody what  happened,” Perks said.
  
  “This, I think, today is a tremendous failure in openness,  transparency and accountability on the part of this council ... I have  never witnessed council before voting on whether or not a motion should be in  public or in private.
  
  “Never witnessed it.
  
  “And I hope to never witness it again.”
  
          The Aug. 17, 2017 award followed arbitration after  negotiations broke down between the city and the Toronto Professional Fire  Fighters’ Association.
          
          The award boosted wages by 8.35 per cent over four years,  so, at the end of the four-year deal, a first-class firefighter will earn  $98,454, about the same amount as a first-class police constable under a  negotiated deal between the city and Toronto Police Association.
          
          The firefighter base pay hike will add $32 million to the  city budget by 2018, an amount city staff warned would have a “significant  financial impact” on the cost of operating the Toronto Fire Services.
          
          Further, it will “challenge the ability of Toronto Fire  Services to maintain effective on-duty staffing levels on a day-to-day basis,”  said a report from city manager Peter Wallace.
          
          Arbitrator James Hayes “broke from the long-established  principle of wage parity” between first class firefighters and their police  counterparts by giving firefighters higher pay hikes in 2016 and 2017, the  report says.
          
          While “these figures may not appear significant, the  arbitrator’s rationale for this award is more problematic,” the report says.
          
          While Toronto police “exchanged moderate wage increases for  concessions ... none of those concessions were awarded by arbitrator Hayes,”  it said.
          
  “In fact, arbitrator Hayes failed to include any meaningful  city proposals in this arbitration award, resulting in an award that is almost  entirely one-sided and unbalanced.”
  
          Last month, Frank Ramagnano, president of the Toronto  Professional Fire Fighters’ Association, said the only way the city could seek  a judicial review is if the arbitrator made an error in law, and “I’m not aware  of anything in this award that that would be the case.”