Richmond Hill to  appeal OMB decision on how much parkland developers must hand over
In a process closely watched by other GTA cities, a court has ruled the town can appeal a decision that strongly favoured developers.
Thestar.com
            April 20, 2016
            By Noor Javed
  
            The  Town of Richmond Hill has won a minor victory, after a judge ruled this week  that it can appeal an Ontario Municipal Board decision that capped how much the  town could ask developers to pay for parkland in exchange for building condos  in the booming suburb.
  
            The  municipality will now head to Divisional Court, to make the case for why it  should be allowed to implement its own policy, instead of the one determined by  the OMB - an unelected board that has become the de facto decision maker in  countless planning matters across the province.
  
  “We  are appealing the OMB decision as we believe that planning for the long term  future of communities is a municipal responsibility,” said Richmond Hill Mayor  Dave Barrow. “No one is better equipped to understand or respond to the needs  of the community.”
  
            In  his decision in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Justice H.J.  Wilton-Siegel said the case “engages the issue of the correct balance between  the flexibility that municipal councils seek in their land use planning and the  transparency and certainty that developers seek,” he said.
  
            The  town, in conjunction with the community, spent two years developing a parks  plan that would guarantee residents ample green space for its residents in  light of intensification pressures.
  
            But  the plan relied on getting condo developers to pay for green space through a  parkland dedication bylaw - a provision of the provincial Planning Act that  requires developers and builders to set aside either land or pay cash-in-lieu.
  
            In  2013, the town passed a bylaw that applied the maximum amount permitted in the  Act: one hectare for every 300 units, or the cash equivalent. As a lesser  amount, the town added in the bylaw that developers could pay 1 hectare for  every 730 new residents.
  
            Developers  balked and took the town to the OMB, saying the rate was a “serious  disincentive” to development.
Last  year, in its decision, the OMB sided with the developers and said the town’s  rate was too high. It imposed a cap on how much the town could charge instead:  25 per cent of the land being developed, or its value in cash.
            
            Ana  Bassios, the Town’s commissioner of planning, said the OMB’s rate would  shortchange the town’s parks plan by at least $70 million.
  
            Municipalities  across the GTA are closely watching the outcome of this case. Markham, Vaughan,  Mississauga and Oakville all had intervener status during the proceedings, and  supported Richmond Hill’s position.
  
  “They  may all have different rates, but the point is that it is really up to the  municipality and local council,” said Bassios. “They want to the ability to  determine their own future, like we do,” she said.
BY THE NUMBERS