Time to rewrite Canada’s Citizenship Act, advocate says
It’s time for the Citizenship Act to be scrapped and rewritten, says Don Chapman -  and he believes the upcoming 150th anniversary of Confederation is the perfect time.

thestar.com
March 3, 2016
By Stephanie Levitz

When it comes to immigration law, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau likes to say, “A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian” - but one advocate says it’s actually not that simple.

Before giving a convicted terrorist back his claim to the Maple Leaf, the Liberal government should consider all the law-abiding people who can’t get citizenship because the existing law creates too many road blocks, said Don Chapman, who has for years championed the cause of so-called “lost Canadians.”

It’s time for the Citizenship Act to be scrapped and rewritten, Chapman said - and he believes the upcoming 150th anniversary of Confederation is the perfect time.

Those born in Canada were considered British until the definition of Canadian citizenship was established in 1947 - which is where the problems began. For instance, a baby born outside Canada to a Canadian woman married to a non-Canadian man wasn’t considered Canadian, but a baby born to an unmarried Canadian woman was.

In 1977, an updated law created new issues. It established the concept of dual citizenship, but did not restore Canadian citizenship for those who lost theirs when they switched under the earlier law.

The consequences of these two pieces of legislation were people who became known as “lost Canadians” - mostly those who believed themselves to be citizens, but by law were not.

The act has been amended several times. There are now 18 definitions of what makes a person a Canadian citizen with more than a dozen caveats, linked to everything from what year they were born to whether their parents were Canadian diplomats or soldiers.

Still, Chapman said he hears from people nearly every day who have suddenly learned they aren’t citizens, or can’t get the decades-old birth certificates of their now-deceased parents to prove that they are. They end up in endless battles with the government or before the courts, and need a citizenship ombudsman who could help, speeding up the system at the same time.

And yet the first thing the Liberals did with the Citizenship Act was to restore the status of a convicted terrorist, Chapman said.

They did it with Bill C-6, introduced last month to revoke a provision of the existing law that allowed dual citizens to be stripped of their Canadian citizenship if convicted of terrorism or other crimes against the country.

When the law was introduced by the Conservatives, critics assailed it for creating two tiers of Canadian citizenship. That’s what prompted Trudeau’s now-familiar campaign line, “A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian,” when he promised to change the law.

The Liberal law will also restore citizenship to the one person who lost it under the old bill - Zakaria Amara, now serving a life sentence in connection with a plot to bomb Toronto.

“From my point of view, this is a question of principle,” Immigration Minister John McCallum said in announcing the proposed changes last week.

“If one believes that a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian, and there is only one class of Canadian, those principles must be applied universally.”

Maybe so, but they aren’t when it comes to lost Canadians, said Chapman.

“For our group it might take years and hundreds of thousands of dollars (to get citizenship recognized),” he said.

“For the terrorist, they’ll get recognized immediately on the implementation of C-6 with no out-of-pocket expenses.”